
From AI access to operational AI.
Team enablement, connected systems, and venture workflows that save 10–20 hours every week.
Tyrza NanlohijOperations Lead
Read case studyAI readiness assessment for your company
We learn how your company works, then identify where AI can save time, reduce cost, or improve the result. You receive a ranked shortlist based on expected impact and effort.
Employee conversations · recommendations in 14 days · ranked by impact and effort

Team enablement, connected systems, and venture workflows that save 10–20 hours every week.
Tyrza NanlohijOperations Lead
Read case studyHow it works
The first three steps produce the assessment and recommendations. Implementation is a separate choice.
Selected employees show us where time and effort go today.
Together, we test what fits your goals and constraints.
Ordered by expected impact, effort, and speed to value.
After day 14, we can help put the chosen solution in place.
Assessment and recommendations completed in 14 days
Why the assessment
We have worked with many companies, and each one runs differently. We learn your work and constraints before recommending where AI can create the biggest impact and a credible path to a positive return on investment.
The result is a shortlist ranked by impact, effort, and speed to value.
Your report
The report shows readiness and team differences. In the review, we compare opportunities by expected business impact and effort so you can choose where to invest.
Sample company report
Acme GmbH · 14 employee conversations
Based on 14 employee conversations. The score shows how people describe the work today; it does not score individual employees.
A team appears after three people have taken part. Darker blue means the practice is used more often. A dash means we do not have enough information.
| Awareness | Attitude | Adoption | Ability | Ambition | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organisation14 perspectives | 72 | 73 | 67 | 45 | 61 | 64 |
| Finance3 perspectives | 57 | 65 | 59 | 42 | 47 | 54 |
| LeadershipFewer than 3 perspectives | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Marketing3 perspectives | 80 | 75 | 68 | 42 | 66 | 66 |
| Operations3 perspectives | 43 | 48 | 51 | 22 | 36 | 40 |
| Sales3 perspectives | 90 | 90 | 83 | 61 | 74 | 80 |
High attitude, low ability. The dashed line shows the level needed for repeatable use.
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Awareness | 72 |
| Attitude | 73 |
| Adoption | 67 |
| Ability | 45 |
| Ambition | 61 |
Do people know what AI can do in their own job, not only in general?
Do people trust it enough to rely on it, with judgment about what to check?
Are people using AI regularly in real work?
How advanced is their reported use, from one-off prompting to repeatable and automated work?
How far can people see beyond current use toward a better way of working?
The three areas with the most room for improvement, shown in priority order.
Move beyond isolated prompts: package the context, steps, checks, and recovery path for one useful workflow.
Take one valuable idea and define the workflow, owner, systems, guardrails, and smallest credible next step.
Choose one recurring task, give it an owner, and follow whether the new practice is actually used week after week.
This is the real report format with example data. Your report is based on your company and the work your employees describe.
Customer stories

Nyra Health upskills engineers without lowering the product bar.

TimeTac built its own automations and put 54 of them on schedule.

Speedinvest moves from AI access toward operational AI.
Safe for employees
Each employee speaks one-to-one, without a manager or group listening.
We only show a team result when at least three people are represented.
We assess how work gets done. We do not rank people or judge their performance.
Talk through your situation
We will ask a few questions and suggest which employees should take part. You approve the plan before we contact anyone.
We will use this to understand your situation and contact you. Nothing starts until you approve it.
Questions
No. We agree on a small group that represents the work you want to improve. This usually includes a leader, a team lead, and employees who do the work each week.
We report shared team findings, not employee performance. We only show a team result when at least three people are represented, and names can be left out.
Employees describe recent examples of their work in a private conversation. We can ask follow-up questions and understand why a problem happens, instead of giving you an average survey score.
Each participant needs about 20–25 minutes. Interviews happen privately whenever convenient, so there is no workshop to coordinate across the whole company.
We contact you to understand what you want to improve and suggest who should take part. You approve the plan before we contact any employees or start any paid work.
No. The assessment and recommendations stand on their own. You can implement them with your team or another partner. If you want our help, we can plan and deliver the work with you.
We look at the time a process takes, how often it happens, the information available, and the risk of getting it wrong. We then rank opportunities by expected impact and effort, with a focus on the strongest path to a positive return.